01
IntakeUnderstand the work
A real working conversation.
Ninety minutes to learn your role, your team, the decisions you own, and where Claude most plausibly earns a seat. I do the homework before we meet.
90 minutesA one-on-one working session for executives and business leaders who keep hearing about Claude and want to see what it does on their own material. Calibrated to your role, your files, and the decisions in front of you this quarter.
Most executives met AI through ChatGPT. Claude tends to arrive second, recommended by a colleague who uses it for the heavy work: the ninety-page agreement, the board pack, the strategy memo that has to survive legal review. It reads long material carefully, holds an argument across a full draft, and pushes back when your reasoning has a gap.
That strength changes how the session runs. We set up Claude Projects around your standing work, so the context you currently retype into every prompt lives in one place. We draft real documents, in your voice, against your templates. If your work touches data or reporting, we look at what Claude can build for you directly. Everything happens on your files, and nothing on demo prompts.
A 90-minute intake to learn the work you do. A 90-minute bespoke training with Claude applied to your actual drafts and decisions. A two-week tail of follow-up while the practice compounds.
A real working conversation.
Ninety minutes to learn your role, your team, the decisions you own, and where Claude most plausibly earns a seat. I do the homework before we meet.
90 minutesHands on, one screen open.
Ninety minutes, just the two of us. Projects, document drafting, and the workflows that fit your role, applied to your actual files in the order you'll use them.
90 minutesA written record, and a tail.
The Claude Projects we set up together, custom templates calibrated to your work, a written summary, the session recording, and two weeks of email follow-up.
Two weeksA single, complete engagement for leaders who have decided to stop reading about Claude and put real reps in on their own material.
Your individual session is often the first step. When you're ready to install Claude across a leadership team, or design custom AI solutions on top of it, we work with companies on extended engagements.
Discuss a team engagement→The practice is tool-agnostic, and many sessions cover both. This one is for leaders who have decided Claude deserves a proper look: long documents, careful reasoning, standing context that persists between conversations. If the honest answer for part of your work is a different tool, you will hear that too. The division of labor between tools matters more than the choice of one.
Yes, in whatever mix fits your work. Projects for the standing context you now repeat in every prompt. Artifacts for documents you will actually ship. Where it makes sense, a look at agent workflows like Claude Code. The filter is always the same: what you will still be using two weeks later.
That is one of the questions the session answers with evidence. We run your real material through Claude and you see where it earns a seat and where your current stack is already enough. Ninety minutes on your own files beats a year of vendor pages.
No. The session assumes fluency in your function, nothing else. If you can brief a sharp new hire, you can do everything we cover.
Depth beats a demo.
For the broader session across tools, see executive AI coaching. If you sit in the CEO seat, the parallel session is AI coaching for CEOs. For the comparison groundwork, read Claude vs ChatGPT for executives.